Vaccinations: Difference between revisions
Line 47: | Line 47: | ||
[[Fallen Angelics]] | [[Fallen Angelics]] | ||
[[Armageddon Software]] | [[Armageddon Software]] |
Revision as of 04:31, 27 March 2015
Recently there has been media spin promoting disease programming through the aggressive creation of fear and the push for legalizing forced vaccinations of children. Many articles have been posted recently in the news by medical professionals urging you to vaccinate, with a variety of public relation messages to urge people to trust your health to the medical system professional. This implies the person has no intelligence (is stupid) in regards to managing their own health and body, and to give your power fully over to the people that make multiple billions in revenue from the drug and medical system. Who with common sense can truly believe that these drug companies have your families health and wellbeing as their priority? This is a perfect example of Psycho-Spiritual Warfare (mind control) on the public to create panic around the medical agenda to prescribe as many pharmaceuticals and vaccinations as possible, without people questioning or performing due diligence on what they are being injected with or swallowing. The question really is to ask who is benefiting from this propaganda and why are they pushing vaccinations and commercials for “friendly doctors you can trust” so hard in the media now?
We all have seen the many televised commercials for drugs repeating the phrase “Ask your Doctor” for what pharmaceutical may be right for you or your family. The Big Pharmas invest a ton of advertising money in pushing their drugs on the public. They really don’t care if it works or not, they just want consumers. From the World Health Organization (WHO) website:
“The global pharmaceuticals market is worth US$300 billion a year, a figure expected to rise to US$400 billion within three years. The 10 largest drugs companies control over one-third of this market, several with sales of more than US$10 billion a year and profit margins of about 30%. Six are based in the United States and four in Europe. It is predicted that North and South America, Europe and Japan will continue to account for a full 85% of the global pharmaceuticals market well into the 21st century. Companies currently spend one-third of all sales revenue on marketing their products - roughly twice what they spend on research and development.
As a result of this pressure to maintain sales, there is now, in WHO's words, “an inherent conflict of interest between the legitimate business goals of manufacturers and the social, medical and economic needs of providers and the public to select and use drugs in the most rational way”. This is particularly true where drugs companies are the main source of information as to which products are most effective. Even in the United Kingdom, where the medical profession receives more independent, publicly-funded information than in many other countries, promotional spending by pharmaceuticals companies is 50 times greater than spending on public information on health.”
It is blaringly obvious that there is a massive conflict of interest between the public’s health and wellbeing that stands between the billions of dollars generated to the Pharmaceutical companies. No sane person can refute this, it is fact. Happy drug commercials with smiling paid actors to hide following the trail of money is just one of the agendas at work to pull the wool over people’s eyes. We are not even addressing the sinister levels of the NAA eugenicist program that is actually behind this vaccine and pharmaceutical agenda. This is just about plain common sense and following the money to see who actually gets paid to carry this agenda out.
Typical Vaccine Ingredients
Let’s look at some of the vaccine ingredients. Different vaccines contain different ingredients that can include lab altered live or inactivated viruses and bacteria, chemicals, metals, proteins, antibiotics and human, animal and insect DNA and RNA.
Vaccines typically contain many of the following fillers:
- aluminum hydroxide * aluminum phosphate * ammonium sulfate * amphotericin B * animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain, * dog kidney, monkey kidney, * chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg * calf (bovine) serum * betapropiolactone * fetal bovine serum * formaldehyde * formalin * gelatin * glycerol * human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue) * hydrolized gelatin * mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r)) * monosodium glutamate (MSG) * neomycin * neomycin sulfate * phenol red indicator * phenoxyethanol (antifreeze) * potassium diphosphate * potassium monophosphate * polymyxin B * polysorbate 20 * polysorbate 80 * porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein * residual MRC5 proteins * sorbitol * tri(n)butylphosphate, * VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and * washed sheep red blood.
Common sense and a thinking brain will clearly tell people/parents, that most of these are ingredients that are not safe ( and at the very least questionable) for injection into the body, let alone the vaccine dose schedule suggested for babies and children. Does anyone really want these chemicals, animal and insect DNA injected directly into their blood stream?
The incredible statistic from the National Vaccine Information center states that in 1990, 1 Child in 555 was diagnosed with Autism. In 2013, 1 Child in 50 was diagnosed with Autism.
The recent measles outbreak at Disneyland became the vehicle for the momentum of jumping on the vaccination bandwagon, and the media has been milking this for all its worth to get scared parents and people running to their local pharmacy or doctor for shots. Right now, California legislators are trying to pass a bill removing exemptions from vaccinating children, which means they are trying to remove the parents rights to not vaccinate their child. These are a few such media stories of many, that paints the parents that choose to not vaccinate their child as responsible for killing others, by putting other children at risk to die. Its the blaming game of Victim-Victimizer mind control programming, trying to create divide and conquer between parents of vaccinated and non-vaccinated children. When parents are terrified that their non-vaccinated child will be ostracized and lose their (vaccinated) friends at school from irate parents and faculty – will they fall into the pressure to vaccinate? This psychological warfare tactic is despicable.
It is important to not "jump on the bandwagon" with a conspiracy rhetoric on every case, but to compile this information and study it with common sense and objectivity. Look at who is saying the words, who they represent and why they are saying it. Why the push now? Who is really benefiting and how much money is behind it? The sad thing is many doctors and people think that vaccinations and drugs are a good thing, with no awareness of the larger agenda to completely disconnect the human nervous system from activating spiritual functions in the physical body. It is hard to observe the alien machine at work, but I feel its positive for us to see this machinery and to observe its agenda as its happening. [1]
Remember that you can learn more from the National Vaccine Information Center by visiting: www.nvic.org/
Informed Consent of AMA Ethics
A mandatory vaccination policy -- forced vaccination of unwilling recipients -- is, by definition, a medical intervention carried out without the consent of the patient or the patient's parents. This directly violates the very clear language in the Informed Consent section of the AMA Code of Medical Ethics which states:"The patient should make his or her own determination about treatment... Informed consent is a basic policy in both ethics and law that physicians must honor, unless the patient is unconscious or otherwise incapable of consenting and harm from failure to treat is imminent."[2]
Pharmas Immunity from Lawsuits
Parents can't sue drug firms when vaccines cause harm, Supreme Court says. A federal law grants drug companies immunity from certain lawsuits from injuries or deaths tied to vaccines, the US Supreme Court affirmed Tuesday.In a 6-to-2 decision, the high court said Russell and Robalee Bruesewitz’s lawsuit was preempted under the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986. The law grants drug companies immunity from certain lawsuits from injuries or deaths tied to vaccinations.“We hold that the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act preempts all design-defect claims against vaccine manufacturers brought by plaintiffs who seek compensation for injury or death caused by vaccine side effects,” wrote Justice Antonin Scalia in the majority decision.[3]
Pocket Card Notice of Non Consent
In light of the current ebola campaign, some folks carry a 4X6 NOTICE of non-consent pocket card in case employees of our corporate government attempt to demand they accept a vaccine or insist they relocate to an isolation center. While there is no guarantee the statute enforcers will recognize this notice, without it - in our current system - it may not be on the record that consent has been denied. For more information go to:[4]
References
- ↑ Vaccination Psyop
- ↑ [www.naturalnews.com/048571_mandatory_vaccines_code_of_ethics_American_Medical_Association.html] Mandatory Vaccine Code of Ethics of AMA
- ↑ Parents cannot sue Drug Firms Feb. 22, 2011
- ↑ Parents Against Mandatory Vaccines