Color Revolution
These are revolutionary movements or insurrection attempts of an existing geo-political power that often adopt a specific color as their symbol, such as in Ukraine's Orange Revolution (2004) and Kuwait's Blue Revolution (2005).
Derived from cases of Color Revolution it is found that the order for color revolution to occur or be able succeed, there are four criteria which must be satisfied. Firstly, their incumbent leader of the regimes must be very unpopular and face the so-called ‘lame-duck syndrome’. Secondly, the anti-regimes forces are enforced by mass-media and foreign influences. Thirdly, the revolution must not be ideological; it must be for the sake of better national integration, freedom, democracy and economic development. Most importantly, the demand for such improvement should be massive among the population. Lastly, the anti-regime forces should also be motivated by the grievances on the corrupted government which is supported by a foreign state which the people do not desire. The anti-regime forces that happened in post-Soviet countries can only be transformed into a successful color revolution if these criteria are fulfilled.
The former ambassador to Russia under the Obama Administration, Michael McFaul, came up with "7 Pillars of Color Revolution," a list of seven steps needed to incite the type of revolution used to upend Eastern European countries like Ukraine and Georgia in the past two decades. Here are McFaul's seven steps:
1. Semi-autocratic regime (not fully autocratic) – provides opportunity to call incumbent leader "fascist"
2. Appearance of unpopular president or incumbent leader
3. United and organized opposition – Antifa, BLM
4. Effective system to convince the public (well before the election) of voter fraud
5. Compliant media to push voter fraud narrative
6. Political opposition organization able to mobilize "thousands to millions in the streets"
7. Division among military and police [1]