36,351
edits
Critical Theory: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In sociology and political philosophy, the term [[Critical Theory]] describes the Western [[Cultural Marxism|Marxist philosophy]] of the Frankfurt School, which was developed in Germany in the 1930s. This use of the term requires proper noun capitalization, whereas "a critical theory" or "a critical social theory" may have similar elements of thought, but not stress its intellectual lineage specifically to the Frankfurt School. Frankfurt School critical theorists drew on the critical methods of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud. | In sociology and political philosophy, the term [[Critical Theory]] describes the Western [[Cultural Marxism|Marxist philosophy]] of the Frankfurt School, which was developed in Germany in the 1930s. This use of the term requires proper noun capitalization, whereas "a critical theory" or "a critical social theory" may have similar elements of thought, but not stress its intellectual lineage specifically to the Frankfurt School. Frankfurt School critical theorists drew on the critical methods of Karl Marx and Sigmund Freud. <ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outline_of_critical_theory Critical Theory]</ref> | ||
[[Critical Theory]] is the act of criticizing or the intentional gathering of public attacking that is directed towards any social institution or social issue, without giving any solution or offering any other alternative in its place. This can be used as a mainstream media [[Propaganda]] tactic in order to sway public opinion on any social issue by intentionally demonizing the group or institution, with or without sufficient evidence of the accusations made. | [[Critical Theory]] has been weaponized in the [[Culture Wars]] as political correctness. It is the act of criticizing or the intentional gathering of community organizers for public attacking that is directed towards any social institution or social issue, without giving any solution or offering any other alternative in its place. This can be used as a mainstream media [[Propaganda]] tactic in order to sway public opinion on any social issue by intentionally demonizing the group or institution, with or without sufficient evidence of the accusations made. | ||
==Outrage Culture, Political Correctness== | |||
The western value system in the United States has been deeply mired in the effects of the [[Outrage Culture]], building momentum through targeting the youngest minds to enforce classifications of [[Political Correctness]] for the purpose of censoring free speech and aggressively shaming people into submission. The orchestration of the [[Pestilence Program|plandemic]] along with the economic devastation of Americans, the utter destruction and anarchy in major cities, informs us of the intended direction of the current [[Power Elite|globalist agenda]]. Which is to destroy the American [[Constitution]] through spreading hatred and continue to [[Demoralization|demoralize]] its citizens in any way that they can, in order to attempt to stage their coup d’état.<ref>[https://energeticsynthesis.com/resource-tools/news-shift-timelines/3617-groupthink Groupthink]</ref> | |||
==Political Correctness== | ==Political Correctness== | ||
| Line 10: | Line 13: | ||
As Marxist-Leninist movements gained political power, the phrase came to be associated with accusations of dogmatic application of doctrine, in debates between American Communists and American Socialists. This usage referred to the Communist party line which, in the eyes of the Socialists, provided "correct" positions on all political matters. According to American educator Herbert Kohl, writing about debates in New York in the late 1940s and early 1950s, | As Marxist-Leninist movements gained political power, the phrase came to be associated with accusations of dogmatic application of doctrine, in debates between American Communists and American Socialists. This usage referred to the Communist party line which, in the eyes of the Socialists, provided "correct" positions on all political matters. According to American educator Herbert Kohl, writing about debates in New York in the late 1940s and early 1950s, | ||
The term "politically correct" was used disparagingly, to refer to someone whose loyalty to the Communist Party line overrode compassion, and led to bad politics. It was used by Socialists against Communists, and was meant to separate out Socialists who believed in egalitarian moral ideas from dogmatic Communists who would advocate and defend party positions regardless of their moral substance.— "Uncommon Differences", The Lion and the Unicorn. <ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_correctness Political Correctness | The term "politically correct" was used disparagingly, to refer to someone whose loyalty to the Communist Party line overrode compassion, and led to bad politics. It was used by Socialists against Communists, and was meant to separate out Socialists who believed in egalitarian moral ideas from dogmatic Communists who would advocate and defend party positions regardless of their moral substance.— "Uncommon Differences", The Lion and the Unicorn. <ref>[https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Political_correctness Political Correctness]</ref> | ||