36,343
edits
Law of Consent: Difference between revisions
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
'''What we hold as our intention in our personal thoughts is what we hold as our Consent towards that thought-form and its vibrational quality and force, as well as the energetic consequence that thought-form substance makes to our self and others.''' | '''What we hold as our intention in our personal thoughts is what we hold as our Consent towards that thought-form and its vibrational quality and force, as well as the energetic consequence that thought-form substance makes to our self and others.''' | ||
* The sum total of the energetic intention behind the accumulated thoughts or words that we have said in the now moment, is more important than the language used to establish consent and authority. The fact we think the thought automatically, means we have given | * The sum total of the energetic intention behind the accumulated thoughts or words that we have said in the now moment, is more important than the language used to establish consent and authority. | ||
* The fact we think the thought automatically under [[Mind Control]] programs, means we have given the thought consent even without our conscious participation with intent. This is the main factor in [[NAA]] human exploitation. | |||
* The sum total of our accumulative vibrational thoughts and expressed words will override the personal consent and authority. What this means is that the true heart vibration or energetic signature of what is thought or spoken, is more important that what is said out loud in language or words. | * The sum total of our accumulative vibrational thoughts and expressed words will override the personal consent and authority. What this means is that the true heart vibration or energetic signature of what is thought or spoken, is more important that what is said out loud in language or words. | ||