Ban of Non Interference: Difference between revisions

And so one of the questions in terms of grammatical correctness is the Ban of Non-interference, if we look at that statement there's a double negative there and the challenge with this is understanding, as we know, sometimes bringing in the etheral and the energetics of what we are experiencing or seeing and bringing it into verbalization, it doesn't translate very well. And goodness knows we have a big issue with that in our community where so much of what we are discussing can be misunderstood because of the context that is used on the earth plane for written language.

Meaning what is your intention? What are you doing right now? What are you trying to communicate? How do you communicate that? And each person communicates a little bit differently there could be cultural differences, there could be educational differences, there could be a lot of differences, so finding words that reasonate for you is fine. Its understanding the meaning and be just like translating it into another language like Spanish or French or Russian or something. You choose a word that was appropriate to what you are trying to say, and God knows English there's like a flatness. I think that was a part of the reptilian hierarchy as well, taking over the language because English is so flat and unemotional most of the time. The words don't really describe adequately the multiple dimension of something and trying to have English to use as a language obviously not adequate.

But in coming back to the Ban of Non-interference when you think of ban as a verb and you think of non-interference you are thinking double negative. ‘I am placing a ban’ which means stop and ‘I’m putting non-interference’. On a quick sort of looking at that, a quick feel of that, there seems to be a grammatical error there. Because the Ban of Non-interference came from a shortening of a script that was ‘I place a Ban of Non-interference around.’ Now understanding what a Ban is, and thats what I want to describe for a moment.

Now a krystic person cannot entertain that. That is not a krystic person. So we do the best we can, given our level of awareness at the time, to be in alignment to cosmic sovereign law which means we cannot superimpose, we cannot use force, but we can deflect, and we can defend. So this is important to understand. Improper use of the law in Ban of Non-interference, this Ban when it is used inappropriately it can be used as a curse. So Satanic forces when they are using curses or hexes, they are using a type of ban but they are using it negatively because they are not taking responsibility for the usage of their own direction of energy.

Now an example of this would be like think of little kids on a schoolyard and the little kid goes to the teacher and says ‘Johnny is staring at me, I dont like Johnny staring at me. Make him stop. I place a ban around Johnny for staring at me.’ Okay now this is ridiculous right. So basically it's the kid saying, having a tantrum, I don't want this for whatever reason, and not out of respect for the other person's right to look, maybe he doesnt like the way he looks, or whatever that person has a right to look one way, or look the other way or whatever. So just because you don't like it, doesnt mean you can put a ban on that person. And this is something that happens in the New Age right, a person is upset with another person and maybe uses a curse or a ban of a particular activity they don't like just because they don't like it, because they are being childish. Now when you do that it's something that is a type of manipulation and that ban what you're doing is you're basically cursing that person. You're saying ‘I'm putting this ban around you’ and so when you do something like this, you should make sure that it is legitimate and that there really is some kind of intent to create destruction or harm. Somebody staring at you is not per se intending to hurt you, but when there is intent to harm and when there is intent to interfere, and when there is intent to create destruction, well then you have a great case for a Ban of Non-interference.

So a ban in this context is not a curse. When it is abused it can be a curse, but a ban in this context is an actual structure. So the Guardian told me that the ban, consider it a energetic structure and the non-interference is the program. You have a structure and you have a program. Now the structure you can program it with any thing. If you want to do ban of chem trails you can do that too. So you are creating a structure and the program of that structure is to deflect chemtrails or poisons or pesticides or whatever. You can use the ban for anything, but understand that the ban is an energetic structure. You are creating an actual energetic structure and then you program it with what your intent is.

So the ban is a structure. Non-interference is the intent or the program of that structure. This is a deflection technique. Now a deflection technique, so what the difference of this is, the deflection is that you are not interfering with that person. Okay so there's a person maybe from their own ignorance, that person is unaware that they are being used by negative forcess because of their lack of consciousness. Now to deflect a particular directional field that is being sent to interfere or create harm, truly they may not be aware that that is actually what they are being used to do. So in deflecting what you are doing is you're deflecting the stream of negativity or the stream, think of a river of energy that river of energy is being sent to you lets say for interference. So that interference may be coming from intent from that person, or the person has no idea because they have no idea what consent or intent even is. So when you deflect from a Ban of Non-interference you are not interfering with that person's individual right to choose what force comes in or out of that person. And this is important even if they do not understand that. Because the krystic person that is in alignment to using the law correctly does not superimpose their will over banning any kind of force that that person is expressing. Meaning that that persons body is being utilized as a certain consciousness and the consciousness is coming through that person, so deflecting means you are not interfering with their growth, you are not interfering with their choice, and you're not superimposing upon them but you are protecting yourself and deflecting any negative interference that could be sent with some kind of harm to you, some kind of harm or some kind of destruction or interference to you. Now that is a deflection technique. Now that can be used anywhere, meaning that in public places, you know because every person in the law has the right to exist and choose the consent of authority of forces that the body is being used to express. Whatever that is, that person has a right to do it.

So let's say you have your home, or you have business, and this is under your responsibility, this is your stewardship. You set your mission and your intent in all of the Law of Structure into what your intentions are for that structure. Now if an entity or person enters that structure, let's say your home, and their intent is to destroy, harm, or do something to tear down that structure, he says in alignment to the law you have every right to isolate, because that entity, its like saying in the Ban of Non-interference because that person is not in your home, you can deflect, but when a person is choosing to use intent to destroy or create harm they lose their sovereign right in the law and thus you can isolate them.

[[Spiritual Maturity]]